The information associated with content through Umecohming consists of structured information required for governance. In I2EA, this information is classified into four categories: Fact, Evaluation, Policy, and Process, each maintained as a distinct type of Record with a different role.

A Fact Record captures observed or verified information, such as creator, timestamp, identifier, location, consent, and confidentiality. It does not evaluate the information or determine whether its use should be permitted or prohibited.

An Evaluation Record captures how the information has been analyzed or evaluated. Because semantic analysis may involve uncertainty, it can represent not only Yes or No, but also states such as Unknown, Possible, and Confidence.

A Policy Record identifies which rules apply and what Actions are required under particular conditions, based on laws, regulations, organizational rules, contracts, and other applicable governance frameworks.

A Process Record captures what was actually performed, including which AI system or other system acted, when it acted, what information it received as Input, what processing occurred, and what result was produced.

Separating these four types is important. For example, an Evaluation that identifies “high risk,” a Policy that states “use is prohibited,” and a Process showing that “access was blocked” represent different types of information. If they are combined, it becomes difficult to distinguish what was established, what was evaluated, what was prescribed, and what actually occurred.

Through Umecohming, these Records are associated with digital content as Fact Tags, Evaluation Tags, Policy Tags, and Process Tags. They can be applied to documents, images, video, audio, source code, and other forms of digital content. As processing continues, new Records can be added, allowing the governance history associated with the information to accumulate over time.

Accordingly, Umecohming does not deal merely with classification labels. It maintains structured governance information that distinguishes what was established, how it was evaluated, which rules were applied, and what actually occurred.